ERC: the long shadow of the Iron Curtain?

The key point is that we should not treat the ranking criteria as absolute. It is at least as important to consider where we stand in terms of cutting-edge research, and here we see a shocking decline, for example, in the success of Hungarian applications to the ERC, Europe’s most important research funding program. Science policy must explain why, while Hungarian success was outstanding a decade and a half ago (we won as many ERC grants as all other Eastern European countries combined), in the last eight years we have won less than half that amount, i.e. between 2007 and 2016 (only Bulgaria and Serbia, with their minimal number of applications, showed such a decline).

Meanwhile, there are a number of departments and research workshops at the international forefront, while others are excellently adapting global science for education and R&D. The efficiency and quality of education, which is not reflected in any way in global rankings, should also be discussed in terms of the status of higher education pedagogy, even though one of Semmelweis’s greatest assets is its ability to attract international students. The lack of adult education specialist training, which has been undermined by silly campaigns, is at least as important as the issue of technology transfer, which is measured in various ways in the rankings (the latter depends more on economic development than on university performance).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.